Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Victor Thomas v. Martynuska, et al
as 24-1824
Plaintiff:
VICTOR DARNELL THOMAS
Defendant:
R.N. MARTYNUSKA, Medical Contractor, FCI Loretto, NORMAN WEIDLICH, Health Care Administrator, FCI Loretto, M.D. KIM SWINDELL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Holloway v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv01289
Petitioner:
Rondell Holloway
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawrence, Sr. v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv01113
Petitioner:
Troy Lawrence, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Winston v. Bradley
as 3:2022cv01081
Petitioner:
LeAnthony T. Winston
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Roberts, Jr. v. Bradley
as 4:2022cv01035
Petitioner:
J.L. Roberts, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Timmy Wallace
Respondent:
United States of America and E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wallace v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00662
Petitioner:
Timmy Wallace
Respondent:
United States of America and E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lawrence, Sr. v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv00595
Petitioner:
Troy Lawrence, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Valdez v. Bradley
as 1:2022cv00228
Petitioner:
Alexis Valdez
Respondent:
E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
