Cases 1 - 10 of 53
ANDRADE et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03663
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDRADE and THE ESTATE OF LAURA E. COOK
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO NA INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cooks v. Bradley
as 1:2021cv00161
Petitioner:
Ronald E. Cooks
Respondent:
Eric Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cooks v. Bradley
as 1:2021cv00142
Defendant:
Eric Bradley
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cooks v. Bradley
as 1:2021cv00103
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Cooks
Defendant:
E. Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COOK v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv20918
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. COOK
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. Berryhill
as 1:2019cv00268
Plaintiff:
Debora E. Cook
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cooke v. Phelps, et al
as 1:2017cv00781
Plaintiff:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Defendant:
Perry Phelps and Dana Metzger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Lester Cook v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 16-4152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER E. COOK
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY YORK COUNTY
Cooke v. Coupe et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Petitioner:
James E. Cooke, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert M. Coupe and David Pierce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cook v. Glunt et al
as 1:2014cv00053
Petitioner:
Lester E Cook
Respondent:
Steven Glunt and Kathleen Kane
Miscellaneous_party:
District Attorney of York County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
