Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DANTZLER v. UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION et al
as 1:2009cv02149
Plaintiff:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, KEITH HILLS, AGENT DOES ONE-FIVE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Oscar Dantzler v. Debbie Pope, et al
as 09-30748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE POPE, City of Hammond Councilmen, HAMMOND CITY, HAMMOND CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Oscar Dantzler v. Debbie Pope, et al
as 09-30372
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE POPE, City of Hammond Councilmen, HAMMOND CITY, HAMMOND CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Oscar Dantzler v. Debbie Pope, et al
as 09-30243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR DANTZLER
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBBIE POPE, City of Hammond Councilmen, HAMMOND CITY, HAMMOND CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Odeh v. Mitchell, et al
as 08-11019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN MITCHELL, A. JOE FISH, U. S. District Judge, TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge and others
Odeh v. Roper, et al
as 08-10780
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA ODEH
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ROPER, CHARLES M BLEIL, TERRY R. MEANS, U. S. District Judge and others
Dantzler v. Pope et al
as 2:2008cv03777
Plaintiff:
Oscar Dantzler
Defendant:
Debbie Pope, Hammond City, Hammond City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
