Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Woody #694786 v. Erickson et al
as 2:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
John David Woody #694786
Defendant:
P. Erickson, D. Viitala, K. Pelky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUSS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75439
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER E HUSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walthall #258598 v. Napel et al
as 2:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Sebryne Walthall #258598
Defendant:
R. Napel, E. Huss, C. Tallio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM FIREMENS AND POLICEMENS SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION SYSTEM v. CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al
as 1:2014cv06200
Plaintiff:
CITY OF BIRMINGHAM FIREMENS AND POLICEMENS SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION SYSTEM
Defendant:
CHIQUITA BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. , KERRII B. ANDERSON , HOWARD W. BARKER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryan #787263 v. Watkins et al
as 1:2014cv00510
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Ryan #787263
Defendant:
Dewey Watkins, Unknown Simon, Unknown Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Littlejohn #141899 v. Richardson et al
as 1:2013cv00763
Plaintiff:
Juivonne Littlejohn #141899
Defendant:
Unknown Richardson, Unknown Wolever, G. Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 et al v. Mutschler et al
as 2:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603 and Ralph Proctor #297924
Defendant:
Kathleen A. Mutschler, P. Johns, Kristi Kangas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresham #272603 v. Napel et al
as 2:2011cv00520
Plaintiff:
Michael Gresham #272603
Defendant:
R. Napel, J. Larson, K. Tribley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Branham #154900 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rodney Branham #154900
Defendant:
MDOC, William Smith, Unknown Groves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
