Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 44
JACKSON v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv00363
Petitioner: CAROL E. JACKSON
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY and THE WARDEN OF WASHINGTON COUNY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITFIELD v. CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01547
Plaintiff: MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant: CONERSTONE BUILDING BRANDS, INC., JAMES S METCALF, ROSE LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
JACKSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2020cv00190
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: FLOYD E. JACKSON
JACKSON-DEGARCIA
as 2:2019mc00215
TALBERT v. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 2:2017cv04208
Plaintiff: CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant: BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, CITY OF CAMDEN, DAVID OWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv06507
Petitioner: CHARLES E. JACKSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson v. Dauphin County Prison et al
as 1:2015cv00489
Plaintiff: Russell E Jackson
Defendant: Dauphin County Prison and Dominick DeRose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01272
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
JACKSON et al v. JACKSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00746
Plaintiff: MATTHEW E. JACKSON, JR. and VELMA L. JACKSON
Defendant: FRANCES E. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv01144
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?