Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Marrero v. Anthony et al
as 1:2022cv01341
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Stephen Anthony, David Kasulones, Private Security Company Contracted at Louis Stokes for Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. Veterans Administration et al
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Veterans Administration, Christopher Robey, Myron Head and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. Vecchiarelli et al
as 1:2016cv01693
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
Magistrate Judge Vecchiarelli, Solomon Oliver, Jr., F.B.I. Agent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Coughlan et al
as 2:2015cv02042
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Richard A Dove, Lori J. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Marrero v. Miller et al
as 2:2015cv01140
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Miller , Reilhe , Litzenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Will et al
as 1:2013cv01991
Plaintiff:
Tito E. Marrero
Defendant:
Dennis P. Will, Tony Cillo, Peter Gauthier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marrero v. Miraldi et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
James Miraldi and Beth Whitmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marrero v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 1:2013cv00216
Petitioner:
Tito E Marrero
Respondent:
Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marrero v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2013cv00073
Petitioner:
Tito E. Marrero
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Marrero v. Mathewson et al
as 1:2011cv01600
Plaintiff:
Tito E Marrero
Defendant:
A.J. Mathewson and Tom Nimon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
