Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Covas et al v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company et al
as 1:2018cv01248
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Lindsey, Michael V. Lujan, Annette McMillan and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scarantino v. Financial Engines, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00892
Plaintiff:
Richard Scarantino
Defendant:
Financial Engines, Inc., Blake R. Grossman, Joseph A. Grundfest and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY v. WM. E. MARTIN & SONS CO., INC.
as 2:2017cv05366
Defendant:
WM. E. MARTIN & SONS CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ziemer v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 4:2016cv01001
Plaintiff:
Shauna Ziemer
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Clinton Township , Griffith Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2015cv00932
Plaintiff:
MARY E. MARTIN
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC, SANOFI US SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv01730
Plaintiff:
Betty E. Martin
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Martin v. Ebbert
as 3:2014cv01249
Petitioner:
Adam E. Martin
Respondent:
Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Magnolia Portfolio, LLC v. Martin et al
as 1:2013mc00389
Plaintiff:
Magnolia Portfolio, LLC
Defendant:
Thomas E. Martin and Helen E. Martin
MAGNOLIA PORTFOLIO, LLC v. MARTIN et al
as 2:2013cv03813
Plaintiff:
MAGNOLIA PORTFOLIO, LLC
Defendant:
THOMAS E. MARTIN and HELEN E. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
