Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Fisk #277464 v. Perkings
as 2:2024cv02372
Plaintiff:
Sergio E Medina Fisk
Defendant:
Dion Douglas Perkings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shotwell v. Chavez-Epperson, et al.
as 24-3459
Plaintiff:
MANUEL EUGENE SHOTWELL
Defendant:
CHAVEZ-EPPERSON, DELANEY, E. MEDINA and others
Medina v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv16891
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Medina
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Medina v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq01023
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Olga E. Medina
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ana Eckart v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
as 23-10753
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANA E. MEDINA ECKART
Defendant / Appellee:
ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY COMPANY
Huynh v. Martella et al
as 3:2022cv00812
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Defendant:
C. Martella, M. Sanchez, E. Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckart v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Ana E. Medina Eckart
Defendant:
Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(PC) Hudkins v. Clark, et al.
as 1:2021cv01473
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Hudkins and William H. Brandstatt
Defendant:
K Clark, T. Campbell, C. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huynh v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) et al
as 3:2021cv04039
Defendant:
P. Sullivan, B. Avina, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Plaintiff:
Tri Huu Huynh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 20-4154
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose E. Medina
Defendant / Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
