Cases 81 - 90 of 141
Clarke v. Cate et al
as 3:2012cv00382
Plaintiff:
Anthony Clarke
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, S. Kernan, A. Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Hedgpeth et al
as 4:2012cv00363
Plaintiff:
Dontavius Haynes
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, A. Solis, S. Hatton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Ever Medina
as 12-4009
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
EVER ENRIQUE MEDINA, a/k/a Ever Medina, a/k/a Ever E Medina, a/k/a Ever Enrique Andrade Medina
Taylor v. Montana et al
as 3:2012cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
E. Montana, Mejia, Keo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl Warner v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-17794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL WARNER
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, A. HETHPATH, individually and in his official capacity as Warden of Salinas Valley State Prison, E. MEDINA and others
Hall v. Salinas Valley State Prison
as 3:2011cv03397
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hall
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison, Mathew Cate, A. Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alfred Shallowhorn v. A. Molina, et al
as 11-16383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Defendant - Appellee:
A. MOLINA, Correctional Counselor, R. THOMAS, Correctional Counselor, E. MEDINA, Captain and others
Gaines v. Hedgpeth et al
as 3:2011cv02124
Plaintiff:
Leslie J. Gaines, Jr.
Defendant:
A Hedgpeth, E. Medina, E. Talanoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. Brim et al
as 4:2011cv01290
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Brim, G. Robinson, N. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Alsobrook v. E Medina
as 11-11244
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER URIAH ALSOBROOK
Defendant - Appellant:
E MEDINA
:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
