Other Statutes Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Oliver v. Michaud, et al
as 23-1518
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS OLIVER
Defendant / Appellee: JOSEPH L. MICHAUD, MARY S. MCELROY, Individual and Official Capacity, JOHN J. MCCONNELL, JR., Individual and Official Capacity and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Smith v. Roger Williams Law School, et al
as 21-1435
Defendant / Appellee: WILLIAM E. SMITH, Justice of the United States District Court as Chair of the RWU Law Board of Directors, OLIVIA MILONAS, MICHAEL YELONSKY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: JIMMY SMITH, and similarly situated persons
Silva v. Smith, et al
as 21-1320
Defendant / Appellee: C. J. WYATT, in is Individual and Official Capacity as a U.S. Marshal Supervisor, JOHN F. MCBURNEY, III, in his Individual and Official Capacity as a RI State Magistrate Judge, US MARSHALS DANGEROUS FUGITIVES TASK FORCE, in their Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: GERALD J. SILVA
Trigo-Gonzalez, et al v. Garcia-Padilla, et al
as 16-2440
Plaintiff - Appellee: DIONISIO TRIGO-GONZALEZ, CARMEN REGINA SUAREZ-SEIN, BENIGNO TRIGO-GONZALEZ and others
Plaintiff: CARMEN FELICIANO VARGAS, FIRST MEDICAL HEALTH PLANS OF PUERTO RICO, INC. and EDUARDO ARTAU GOMEZ
Defendant - Appellee: ALEJANDRO J. GARCIA-PADILLA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, JUAN C. ZARAGOZA-GOMEZ, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico, GOVERNMENT DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PUERTO RICO and others
Movant - Appellant: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD
Interested Party: UNITED STATES
United States of America v. Smith
as 3:2016cv02415
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: David E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Trigo et al v Garcia-Padilla et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02257
Plaintiff: Dionisio Trigo-Gonzalez , Carmen Regina Suarez-Sein , Conjugal Partnership Trigo-Suarez and others
Defendant: Alejandro Garcia-Padilla , Juan C. Zaragoza-Gomez , The Government Development Bank of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DENNISON v. ESTATE OF WENDELL H. DENNISON et al
as 1:2016cv00116
Plaintiff: CAROLE E DENNISON
Defendant: ESTATE OF WENDELL H. DENNISON, WENDELL H. DENNISON SEPARATE PROPERTY TRUST, CHRISTIE F HAYWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: Artis, et al
as 14-1718
Respondent: ANNETTE G. YOUNG, LARRY J. MCCULLOCH, PATRICIA C. MCCULLOCH and others
Petitioner: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Interested Party: SHARON OVERSTREET, PAIN CONSULTANTS OF WEST FLORIDA, ROCHESTER BRAIN AND SPINE NEUROSURGERY & PAIN MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant: HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
In Re: Artis, et al
as 14-1718
Petitioner: SANDRA F. ARTIS, DANA MARLENE BRADLEY, RONNIE A. BROWN and others
Respondent: NEW ENGLAND COMPOUNDING PHARMACY, INC, d/b/a New England Compounding Center, AMERIDOSE, LLC, MEDICAL SALES MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Plaintiff: SHARON G. WINGATE, Executor of the Estate of Douglas Gray Wingate, Deceased and KATHLEEN GUZMAN
Trustee: PAUL D. MOORE, in his capacity as Chapter 11 Trustee of the Defendant New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a New England Compounding Center
Interested Party: PAIN MEDICINE SPECIALISTS PA, UNIVERSAL PAIN MANAGEMENT MEDICAL CORPORATION, d/b/a/ Universal Pain Management, PAIN ASSOCIATES OF CHARLSETON, LLC, d/b/a InverveneMD and others
Defendant: HOWELL ALLEN CLINIC, DEBRA SCHAMBERG, INSIGHT IMAGING, INC. and others
Interested Party - Intervenor: OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS, in the Chapter 11 Case of New England Compunding Pharmacy, Inc
Natale v. The Espy Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv30008
Plaintiff: Suzanne M. Natale
Defendant: The Espy Corporation, Mark E. Smith, Thomas W. Potthast, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?