Cases 21 - 30 of 229
USA v. Eric Alford
as 20-1798
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC ALFORD, also known as E. SMITH also known as DUB also known as E.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Charles Smith, Jr. v. Superintendent Greene SCI, et al
as 20-1621
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
SMITH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2020cv00829
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
MAUREEN E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00008
Plaintiff:
William E Smith
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv21893
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Plaintiff:
JEAN E. SMITH
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franchi v. Fibrocell Science, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02001
Defendant:
Fibrocell Science, Inc., Marc B. Mazur, Kelvin D. Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
Thompson v. Speedway Motorsports, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01597
Defendant:
Speedco, Inc., B. Scott Smith, Sonic Financial Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2019cv16803
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WARDEN
Petitioner:
CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH et al v. EAN HOLDINGS, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00085
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and JESSICA E. SMITH
Defendant:
EAN HOLDINGS, LLC and GREGORY J. POCKL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv09902
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SARAH E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
