Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Smith, Sr. v. McGinley et al
as 3:2023cv01456
Plaintiff: Mark E. Smith, Sr.
Defendant: Thomas S. McGinley
Respondent: District Attorney of Monroe County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
EYAJAN v. ANDREWS AND PONTIUS, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00364
Plaintiff: SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
Defendant: ANDREWS AND PONTIUS, LLC, CAROLYN E. SMITH and UNKNOWN DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1001 Personal Property: Fraud
SMITH
as 2:2021cv05001
In Re: CHARLES E. SMITH and CHARLES E. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 1:2021cv00236
Plaintiff: Charles E Smith
Defendant: Dauphin County Domestics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
as 2:2021cv00439
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. SMITH
Defendant: DAUPHIN COUNTY DOMESTICS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00076
Defendant: CARLOS SAUL, MIKE GREENBURG, ALTERNATIVE COUNSELING SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: CHARLES E. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MATTHEWS v. SMITH
as 1:2020cv00302
Defendant: RYAN E. SMITH
Plaintiff: GERALD MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00008
Plaintiff: William E Smith
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH et al v. EAN HOLDINGS, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00085
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and JESSICA E. SMITH
Defendant: EAN HOLDINGS, LLC and GREGORY J. POCKL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Markle v. Hoffman et al
as 4:2018cv02037
Plaintiff: Joseph R. Markle
Defendant: Police Chief Reynolds, Harry E. Smith and Sgt. Bruce Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?