Cases 41 - 50 of 157
Whitfield v. Mandiant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01973
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Mandiant, Inc., Enrique Salem, Kevin Mandia and others
Banda v. Mandiant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02805
Plaintiff:
Manuel Banda
Defendant:
Mandiant, Inc., Enrique Salem, Kevin Mandia and others
O'Dell v. Mandiant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02782
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Mandiant, Inc., Enrique Salem, Kevin Mandia and others
Stein v. Mandiant, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Mandiant, Inc., Enrique Salem, Kevin Mandia and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Nikolaus J. Marcher et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nikolaus J. Marcher and Lynne Marcher
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., 3M Company aka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv11150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Clemons v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2021cv04052
Plaintiff:
John Clemons
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Rocky Moore, Patrick O'Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado et al v. Morgan Hill Unified School District
as 5:2021cv06611
Plaintiff:
Parents B and E.F. Maldonado and Attorney Blanca C. Vaughan
Defendant:
Morgan Hill Unified School District
Clemons v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID et al
as 4:2021cv02475
Plaintiff:
John Clemons
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice -CID, Bobby Lumpkin, Rocky Noore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
