Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Maryam v. Littler Mendelson, PC
as 1:2023cv02619
Plaintiff:
Fe'Anah Beut Maryam and Fe'Anah Bent Maryam
Defendant:
Littler Mendelson, PC, Benson Pope and Lauren E.L. Tilashalski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Montes et al v. Cardenas et al
as 1:2022cv04208
Plaintiff:
Hilario Montes, Jr., Nicolas Delgado, Uriel Delgado and others
Defendant:
Louis Gerardo Cardenas, Eder Cifuentes, David Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bolar v. Harris et al
as 1:2017cv02972
Plaintiff:
Shelia Mariah Bolar
Defendant:
Shaun L. Harris, K.E. Dean, Iain MacGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Glenn, E.L. v. EverBank, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv03732
Plaintiff:
Matthew Glenn, E.L.
Defendant:
EverBank, Inc. and Philip A. Hasty
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Lipscomb v. Cronic et al
as 2:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Brian O. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Steven D. Cronic, Mark Bandy, Diane Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Humphrey et al
as 5:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Charles Harris
Defendant:
Carl Humphrey, Doug Underwood, Danny Piland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Welch v. Chase et al
as 5:2010cv00043
Plaintiff:
Christopher Welch
Defendant:
Alexis E.L. Chase, Sandra Abrams, Calvin Ramsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Chase et al
as 5:2009cv00412
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Lester
Defendant:
Alexis E.L. Chase, Calvin Ramsey, Edward H. Burnside and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Chase
as 5:2009cv00205
Petitioner:
Willie F Carter
Respondent:
Alexis E.L. Chase
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Chase et al
as 5:2009cv00020
Petitioner:
Franklin L. Williams
Respondent:
Alexis E.L. Chase and Thurman Baker
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
