Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hartman et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02995
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Hartman, Joseph Turner, R.H. and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hill v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2020cv06723
Defendant:
D.J. Taylor, City of Chicago, E.T. Zeman and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Emanuel et al
as 1:2019cv05467
Defendant:
N. Walker, Patrick Munyon, Kim M Foxx and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Richard Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer et al v. Koester et al
as 3:2018cv01215
Plaintiff:
Donald W. Bauer, Lauretta Bauer, Karla Bauer and others
Defendant:
Kimberly G. Koester , John P. Niemerg , Lynette Roots and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Singleton v. Chicago Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv01344
Plaintiff:
Avery Singleton
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department, Glen Matthews, Illinois State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.A. et al v. A.A. et al
as 3:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
A.A. , J.A. , A.B. and others
Defendant:
Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Painters District Council No. 2 et al. v. Park Mark, Inc
as 3:2012mc00089
Plaintiff:
Painters District Council No. 2 et al.
Defendant:
Park Mark, Inc
Garnishee:
E.T. Simonds Construction Company
Turubchuk et al v. E.T. Simonds Construction Company et al
as 3:2012cv00594
Plaintiff:
Liliya Turubchuk , Vladimir Nemstov , Ludmila Nemtsova and others
Defendant:
E.T. Simonds Construction Company and Southern Illinois Asphalt Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walls v. Illinois Department of Human Service Treatment and Detention Center et al
as 1:2007cv02061
Plaintiff:
William Walls
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Service Treatment and Detention Center, Mr. Davis, E.T Skyhopkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
