Cases 1 - 6 of 6
MCCLESKEY et al v. AKE ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 1:2022cv01085
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
AKE ENTERPRISES LLC, AKE ENTERPRISES LLC d/b/a EASON CONSTRUCTION and EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
MARK MCCLESKEY et al v. EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC
as 1:2021cv02676
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY
Defendant:
EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MARK MCCLESKEY, et al v. EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC
as 1:2021cv01250
Defendant:
EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE and MARK MCCLESKEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MARK MCCLESKEY et al v. EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC
as 1:2020cv02076
Defendant:
EASON CONSTRUCTION LLC
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE and MARK MCCLESKEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund et al v. Eason Construction, LLC
as 4:2020cv00962
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Construction Laborers & Contractors Training Fund of Eastern Missouri, Board of Trustees of the Greater St. Louis Construction Laborers Welfare Fund, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
Eason Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Central Laborers' Pension Welfare and Annuity Funds v. Eason Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv01402
Defendant:
CHRIS EASON and EASON CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Plaintiff:
Central Laborers' Pension Welfare and Annuity Funds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
