Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Donald Jones v. United States Supreme Court, et al
as 10-5222
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Supreme Court, William K. Suter, US Supreme Court Clerk of Court, Gail Johnson, US Supreme Court and others
Jones v. Pryor et al
as 3:2010cv02750
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Ed Carnes, Alan J. Baverman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rochelle Driessen v. Susan Black, et al
as 10-10469
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROCHELLE DRIESSEN, mother of minor children, B.O. D/O/B 1993 and B.O. D/O/B 1994
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN H. BLACK, 11th Circuit Judge; U. S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, ED CARNES, 11th Circuit Judge; U. S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit and ROSEMARY BARKETT, 11th Circuit Judge; U. S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit
Driessen v. Black et al
as 1:2010cv00053
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Driessen
Defendant:
Susan Black, Ed Carnes and Rosemary Barkett
Driessen v. Black et al
as 1:2009mi00553
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Driessen
Defendant:
Susan Black, Ed Carnes and Rosemary Barkett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Prescott et al v. Tjoflat et al
as 2:2009cv00341
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Jorg Busse
Defendant:
Gerald B. Tjoflat, United States of America, Joel F. Dubina and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riggins et al v. Land et al
as 4:2007cv00016
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gene Riggins
Defendant:
John H. Land, Douglas C. Pullen, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
