Cases 61 - 70 of 100
Thomas v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv03210
Plaintiff:
Terrieon Kamaria Thomas
Defendant:
John Doe and Eddie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster-Rayford v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv02957
Plaintiff:
Samory Foster-Rayford
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Anita Alvarez and Rahm Emanuel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2017cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jerry Boyle
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Garry McCarthy, John Escalante and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
Ardamis Darrell Sims
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Ronald J. Olszewski , Daniel R. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORE et al v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM et al
as 1:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
HARRIET M MOORE and MINOR CHILD
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY SCHOOL SYSTEM, EDDIE JOHNSON, LOVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lintzeris et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 1:2016cv09154
Plaintiff:
Rita Lintzeris and Zaron Jossell
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Charles L Williams, Patricia Jackowiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAY v. MARTIN et al
as 5:2016cv00232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ERIN GRAY, SR
Defendant:
CORY W MARTIN, HOUSTON HEALTHCARE, BABATUNDE FAGIMAYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2015cv08937
Plaintiff:
Eddie Johnson , Christian Walker , Amadu Sowe and others
Defendant:
City Of New York and Rachael, PO Creswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elton Johnson v. Wendy Kelley
as 15-1718
Petitioner:
Elton Eddie Johnson
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Johnson v. Check Plus Systems, LP, d/b/a CPS Security et al
as 1:2012cv07798
Plaintiff:
Eddie Johnson
Defendant:
Check Plus Systems, LP and CPGP Interests, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
