Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rosenfeld v. Bronfman et al
as 1:2021cv01953
Defendant:
David Gandler, Ignacio Figueras, Pr-Jrgen Prson and others
Nominal Defendant:
FuboTV Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Rosenfeld
Lee v. FuboTV Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01641
Defendant:
Simone Nardi, Edgar Bronfman, Jr., FuboTV Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee and Nordine Aamchoune
Chan v. Time Warner Inc et al
as 5:2016cv06268
Defendant:
TimeWarner Inc, Jim Barksdale, TimeWarner, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chan and Peng Chan
Intervenor:
Brad Greenspan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re: Southgate
as 16-2206
Petitioner:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Respondent:
SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER NOLTE and others
In Re: Southgate
as 16-2206
Petitioner:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Respondent:
WARNER BROS., INC., SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA and others
Southgate v. SoundSpark, Inc., et al
as 16-1365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER NOLTE and others
Defendant:
300 ENTERTAINMENT MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC, ACCESS INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS LLC, ACCESS INDUSTRIES INC and others
Southgate v. SoundSpark, Inc., et al
as 16-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEREMY CHRISTOPHER SOUTHGATE
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUNDSPARK, INC, ANA VILLANUEVA, CHRISTOPHER NOLTE and others
Defendant:
300 ENTERTAINMENT MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC, ACCESS INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS LLC, ACCESS INDUSTRIES INC and others
Southgate v. SoundSpark, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13861
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Jeremy Southgate
Defendant:
SoundSpark, Inc., Ana Villanueva, Christopher Nolte and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Bronfman v. Vivendi S.A. et al
as 1:2007cv02875
Plaintiff:
Edgar Bronfman, Jr. and Edgar Bronfman, Jr.
Defendant:
The Benefit Equalization Plan of Vivendi S.A., The Benefit Equalization Plan of Vivendi S.A., The Benefit Equalization Plan of Vivendi S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
