Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Bar v. Edmond
as 1:2024cv00834
Plaintiff:
Oren Bar
Defendant:
Rachel Edmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Taylor et al v. University Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
University Health Services, Inc. and Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Edmond v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00304
Plaintiff:
Quinton Edmond
Defendant:
Warden Brooks L. Benton, Dr. Olatunji Awe, Nurse Gatewood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CWS Apartment Homes, LLC v. Edmonds
as 1:2022cv03680
Plaintiff:
CWS Apartment Homes, LLC doing business as Marquis at Perimeter Center
Defendant:
Rachel Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Bobb v. R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
as 1:2022cv02558
Plaintiff:
Edmond L. Bobb
Defendant:
R & L Carriers Shared Services, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Edmond v. Awe et al
as 4:2021cv00076
Plaintiff:
Quinton Edmond
Defendant:
Dr. Awe, Coastal State Prison and State of Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
