Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Edmonds Outdoors, LLC v. Expedite International Inc.
as 3:2020cv00995
Plaintiff:
Edmonds Outdoors, LLC doing business as Gunner Kennels
Defendant:
Expedite International Inc. doing business as Lucky Duck
Counter Claimant:
Expedite International Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Edmonds Outdoors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Grissom, Terrance v. Young, Edmond et al
as 3:2017cv00241
Plaintiff:
Terrance Grissom
Defendant:
Edmond Young and Dashun Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fader v. Telfer et al
as 2:2016cv01107
Defendant:
Richard J Telfer and Amy Edmonds
Plaintiff:
Timothy Fader
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smith, Derrick v. Dickman, Robert et al
as 3:2012cv00743
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Smith
Defendant:
Robert Dickman, Edmond J. Jelinski, Edmund J. Jelinski Law Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edmonds v. Rawson Contractors Inc.
as 3:2009cv00315
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Edmonds
Defendant:
Rawson Contractors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Edmonds v. Operating Engineers Local 139
as 3:2008cv00644
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Edmonds
Defendant:
Operating Engineers Local 139
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edmonds v. Operating Engineers Local 139
as 3:2008cv00567
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Edmonds
Defendant:
Operating Engineers Local 139
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Betker et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2008cv00760
Plaintiff:
Richard Betker and Sharon Betker
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Allen Groszcyk, Edmond A Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edmonds v. Cork et al
as 3:2008cv00158
Plaintiff:
Franklin C. Edmonds
Defendant:
Kelley J. Cork and Rachel L. Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
