Cases 1 - 10 of 42
CRUZ v. MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFF et al
as 3:2014cv04078
Plaintiff:
PEDRO CRUZ
Defendant:
MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STAFF and EDMOND C. CICCHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PADILLA v. CICCHIE
as 3:2014cv03066
Plaintiff:
LESNIN PIEDRA PADILLA
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2013cv06152
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI, DASALLE and GROVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YAZID-MAZIN v. MCCORMICK et al
as 3:2013cv05783
Plaintiff:
MADEQ DEANDRE YAZID-MAZIN
Defendant:
KENNETH MCCORMICK, JAMES BENANTI, ANDREW C. CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2013cv05048
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI, JOYCE PIERRE and ROBERT GROVER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. CICCHI
as 3:2013cv03707
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HAYES, JR.
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYES v. CICCHI
as 3:2013cv03706
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HAYES, JR.
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ATNO et al v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al
as 3:2013cv00384
Plaintiff:
KIM ATNO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS, WARDEN EDMOND C. CICCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FISHER et al v. MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2011cv05815
Plaintiff:
MONICA FISHER
Defendant:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS , MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTIONS , EDMOND C. CICCHI and others
Cross_claimant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI and MIDDLESEX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cross_defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DASTAS v. CICCHI et al
as 3:2011cv04679
Plaintiff:
LUIS DASTAS
Defendant:
EDMOND C. CICCHI, JOYCE PIRRE, CALVIN FISHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
