Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, Donna Zickefoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
KING v. REILLY et al
as 1:2010cv01237
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN KING
Respondent:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and ANGELA HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00500
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America, Thomas F. Hogan, Patrick J. Attridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Carter v. Reilly et al
as 3:2009cv01628
Plaintiff:
Arnold Carter
Defendant:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell, Deborah A. Spagnoli and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HILLARD v. REILLY
as 1:2009cv04282
Plaintiff:
NEAL HILLARD
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. REILLY et al
as 1:2009cv04242
Petitioner:
BENJAMIN W. KING
Respondent:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and ANGELA HAYNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
DUFF v. APKER et al
as 3:2009cv00672
Petitioner:
Michael Duff
Respondent:
Craig Apker, Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Defendant:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell, Patricia K. Cushwa and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TORRES v. LEVI et al
as 2:2009cv00696
Petitioner:
MARCELINO TORRES
Respondent:
TROY LEVI, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DUFF v. APKER et al
as 2:2008cv05716
Petitioner:
MICHAEL DUFF
Respondent:
CRAIG APKER, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR., CRANSTON J. MITCHELL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
