Cases 1 - 10 of 81
HATHAWAY v. DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2016cv01825
Plaintiff:
EUGENE CARL HATHAWAY
Defendant:
DIRECTOR, BUREAU OF PRISONS, JACK FOX, EDWARD F. REILLY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hathaway v. Reilly et al
as 1:2015cv01549
Petitioner:
Eugene Carl Hathaway
Respondent:
Edward F. Reilly, Jr. and J. Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
HATHAWAY v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2015cv01030
Petitioner:
EUGENE CARL HATHAWAY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00749
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMSEY v. FAUST et al
as 1:2012cv01818
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD RAMSEY
Respondent:
THOMAS N. FAUST and EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Darrell Parks v. Cranston Mitchell, et al
as 11-5358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darrell James Parks
Defendant - Appellee:
Cranston J. Mitchell, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Patricia K. Cushwa, Chairman of United States Parole Commission, Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Chairman of United States Parole Commission and others
Eddie Wilson v. Isaac Fulwood, Jr., et al
as 11-5119
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eddie Wilson
Defendant - Appellee:
Isaac Fulwood, Jr., Edward F. Reilly, Jr., Cranston J. Mitchell and others
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv01753
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, DONNA ZICKEFOOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Marantz et al
as 1:2011cv00475
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Marantz, T. Blumm, Donna Zickefoose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WORRELL v. REILLY
as 1:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
DAVID PATRICK WORRELL
Defendant:
EDWARD F. REILLY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
