Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BROWN v. COOPER et al
as 2:2024cv01308
Plaintiff: RAYMOND C. BROWN
Defendant: LAKEISHA COOPER, MARCOS ORTIZ, MICHAEL SHILLINGFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARD JONES & CO., L.P. v. JAKIEL
as 1:2018cv00150
Plaintiff: EDWARD JONES & CO., LP
Defendant: BRUCE JAKIEL
Mediator: RONALD FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BURTOFT et al
as 2:2017mc01053
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: THOMAS M. BURTOFT
Garnishee: EDWARD JONES INVESTMENTS
JONES v. USA
as 2:2016cv00299
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: JAMES EDWARD JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA/DEA v. In The Matter of the Seizure of Edward Jones Accounts: 256-80077-1-6 and 256-80110-1-5
as 1:2016mc00008
Plaintiff: USA/DEA
Defendant: In The Matter of the Seizure of Edward Jones Accounts: 256-80077-1-6 and 256-80110-1-5
JONES v. TRITT et al
as 2:2015cv05966
Petitioner: EDWARD JONES
Respondent: BRENDA TRITT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Central Intelligence Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv02664
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Central Intelligence Agency, Graig Buck, Michael Metrinko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. STYLES et al
as 5:2012cv06335
Plaintiff: COREY EDWARD JONES
Defendant: MATTHEW STYLES, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-6 and JOHN DOES 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2012cv03676
Plaintiff: EDWARD JONES
Defendant: AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
JONES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43684
Plaintiff: GEORGE EDWARD JONES, SR.
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?