Cases 51 - 57 of 57
NEWHOUSE et al v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO. et al
as 2:2011cv33203
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO. , BRADLEY FLEET , SKAARUP SHIPPING CORP. and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Scott v. Rapid American Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv07760
Plaintiff:
David Lee Scott
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation, H.B. Fuller Company, Union Carbide Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mauney et al v. A. O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
Sidney William Mauney and Carolyn Armstrong Mauney
Defendant:
A. O. Smith Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, Successor By Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Atlas Foundry Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ODOM et al v. ALLIS-CHALMERS COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv69594
Plaintiff:
THREA ODOM, THREA ODOM, HENRY ODOM and others
Defendant:
ALLIS-CHALMERS COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCO INSULATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Polson v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv10002
Plaintiff:
Paul Polson
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Owens Illinois, Inc, Owens Illinois Glass Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HARRIS v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv90288
Plaintiff:
MARY ELLEN HARRIS and MARY ELLEN HARRIS
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION, VIAD CORPORATION, VIAD CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Harris v. Rapid American Corporation
as 1:2007cv06055
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Harris
Defendant:
Rapid American Corporation, Viad Corporation, Viad Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
