Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lindberg v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 0:2021cv01501
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Lindberg
Defendant:
Branson Ultrasonics Corporation, Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control, LLC and Emerson Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 0:2021cv01499
Defendant:
Branson Ultrasonics Corporation, Emerson Automation Solutions Final Control, LLC and Emerson Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McLelland v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 4:2017cv04007
Plaintiff:
Bubba McLelland
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co. and Ridge Tool Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McMahan et al v. Rheem Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Justin McMahan and Danielle Bissell
Defendant:
Rheem Manufacturing Company, Emerson Electric Co., Trinity Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore et al v. Scroll Compressors, LLC et al
as 6:2014cv03109
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore and Paula Robertson
Defendant:
Scroll Compressors, LLC , Emerson Electric Co. , NALCO Chemical and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Johnson v. Emerson Electric Co.
as 4:2013cv01240
Defendant:
Scroll Compressors LLC , Sensata Technologies, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.
Plaintiff:
Clarence Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
King v. Emerson Electric Co.
as 4:2012cv01450
Plaintiff:
James Robert King
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vickroy v. Emerson Electric Co. et al
as 4:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Joy L Vickroy
Defendant:
Emerson Electric Co., Emerson Electric Co. and Intermetro Industries Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Armstrong v. Wieneke et al
as 3:2009cv00084
Plaintiff:
Sharon Armstrong
Defendant:
Ronald E. Wieneke and Emerson Electric Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
