Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Antonio Byrd v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 16-60473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO BYRD
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, State of Mississippi, HALEY BARBOUR, Governor of State of Mississippi, MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Charles Torns, Jr. v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 15-60399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TORNS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, HALEY BARBOUR, Governor for the State of Mississippi, MALCOLM E. MCMILLIN, Sheriff for Hinds County and others
Vincent Bailey v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60715
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT TITO BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, EMMITT L. SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, BERTHA SPIVEY, STG Coordinator and others
Willie Henry, Jr. v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE L. HENRY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN EMMITT L. SPARKMAN, Deputy Commissioner, FAYE NOEL, Deputy Warden and others
Charles Torns, Jr. v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 12-60850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TORNS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MALCOLM E MCMILLIN, Sheriff for Hinds County, BARBARA DUNN, Hinds County Circuit Court Clerk, HINDS COUNTY SUPERVISOR and others
Ulysses Bownes v. Jim Hood, et al
as 12-60711
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ULYSSES BOWNES
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM HOOD, Mississippi Attorney General, RALPH DOXEY, Former Assistant District Attorney, RAYMOND BYRD, Warden, C.C.A. Wilkinson County Correctional Facility and others
Bradley v. MS Dept Corrections, et al
as 07-60043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONDRIC BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTOPHER EPPS, Commissioner, LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent of the Classification Department and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
