Cases 11 - 20 of 354
Federal Trade Commission v. Vision Online, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Vision Online, Inc. a Florida corporation doing business as Ganadores Online doing business as Winners Online doing business as Ganadores Inversiones Bienes Raices doing business as Ganadores IBR, Ganadores IBR, Inc., Vision Online Digital, LLC and others
Interested Party:
Mark Bernet
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01035
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE v. USA
as 1:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
KING SEMAJ OF THE ENGLISH ESTATE and JAMES THOMAS ENGLISH
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9528
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9527
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
English v. MSPB, et al
as 23-9526
Petitioner:
LEONARD ENGLISH, JR.
Respondent:
MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD and SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Du Truong Nguyen v. United States of America et al
as 8:2022cv01524
Plaintiff:
Du Truong Nguyen
Defendant:
United States of America, Otis D. Wright, II, Sheila English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Hobbs v. Crosby et al
as 4:2022cv00536
Plaintiff:
Katie Hobbs
Defendant:
Tom Crosby, Ann English, Peggy Judd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Michael Robinson v. Brian English
as 23-1008
Applicant:
MICHAEL T. ROBINSON
Respondent:
BRIAN ENGLISH, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
