Cases 1 - 10 of 48
American Paper Optics, LLC v. Zimmerman et al
as 2:2023cv02107
Plaintiff:
American Paper Optics, LLC
Defendant:
Howard Alan Zimmerman, Enom, LLC and Howard Alan Zimmerman d/b/a Lunaweb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
In Re: Request from Japan and/or Vietnam
as 1:2023mc00077
Petitioner:
Shueisha Inc., Shogakukan Inc., KADOKAWA CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
GoDaddy.com, LLC and eNom, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Brian Lynch et al v. AML Network Ltd. et al
as 2:2021cv03574
Plaintiff:
James Andrews, Angela Neilson, Brian Lynch and others
Defendant:
AML NETWORK LTD., Domains By Proxy, LLC, Enom LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WhitServe LLC v. eNom, LLC
as 19-2241
Defendant / Appellee:
ENOM, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WHITSERVE, LLC and WHITSERVE LLC
WhitServe LLC v. Donuts Inc.
as 19-2240
Defendant / Appellee:
NAME.COM, INC., DONUTS INC. and ENOM, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WHITSERVE, LLC and WHITSERVE LLC
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE DOMAIN NAME SERVICED BY ENOM, LLC
as 1:2019ml00819
In Re:
APPLICATION OF USA PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 3512 FOR 2703(d) ORDER FOR ONE DOMAIN NAME SERVICED BY ENOM, LLC
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Whitserve LLC V. eNom, LLC
as 1:2018cv00194
Defendant:
eNom, LLC
Plaintiff:
Whitserve LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Agresta Acquisitions, LLC v. BTC Cloud Services Ltd et al
as 2:2017cv12852
Plaintiff:
Agresta Acquisitions, LLC
Defendant:
BTC Cloud Services Ltd, Esteban Amador Soto Martinez, Gabriel Kleiman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv06848
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Namecheap, Inc. v. Tucows, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01310
Plaintiff:
Namecheap Inc
Defendant:
Tucows Inc , Enom Inc and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
