Cases 1 - 9 of 9
NLRB v. Ground Zero Foundation
as 21-1745
Respondent:
GROUND ZERO FOUNDATION, DBA Academy for Creative Enrichment
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. ADETUTU et al
as 2:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
OLUBUNMI ADETUTU, TAIWO ADETUTU and DABTKE CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND ENRICHMENT CENTERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SECURUS ENRICHMENT SERVICES, L.L.C. v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2014cv03123
Plaintiff:
SECURUS ENRICHMENT SERVICES, L.L.C.
Defendant:
JOSEPH JOHNSON and SENIOR SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02623
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALSH et al v. TOTAL BODY ESSENTIAL NUTRITION, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv04890
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE WALSH and JOSEPH F. WALSH
Defendant:
TOTAL BODY ESSENTIAL NUTRITION, INC., WRIGHT ENRICHMENT, INC. and TEXAMERICAN FOOD BLENDING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ted McCracken v. ConocoPhillip
as 09-1800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant - Appellee:
CONOCOPHILLIPS, RP, INTL BIO ANALYTICAL IND INC, GLENN A COX, President ConocoPhilips and others
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC. v. MCCAMPBELL et al
as 2:2008cv02654
Plaintiff:
GODDARD SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
ROBERT T. MCCAMPBELL, BRENDA E. MCCAMPBELL and EARLY ENRICHMENT CENTER APPLE VALLEY, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCCRACKEN v. CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY et al
as 2:2007cv02039
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY, INTERNATIONAL BIO-ANALYTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC., GLENN A. COX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
