Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gonzalez v. Biden, et al
as 24-1001
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO P. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, et al., MAYORKAS, et al., DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY DHS, GOVERNOR J. POLIS, et al. and others
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
Kolak v. Arapahoe County, et al
as 22-1139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALTER M.J. KOLAK
Defendant / Appellee:
ARAPAHOE COUNTY, ET AL., ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF, S FACILITY, ET AL., HEALTH AND SAFETY OF AMERICA, ET AL. and others
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
Burke v. City of Tulsa, et al
as 22-5026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHELE D. BURKE
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, G.T. BYNUM, Mayor of City of Tulsa, MARK SWINNEY, City of Tulsa Attorney and others
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
Lopez v. Cache County
as 21-4027
Defendant / Appellee:
CACHE COUNTY, et al. and JUDGE TERRY MOORE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY ERNEST LOPEZ
Patterson v. State of Colorado, et al
as 19-1116
Respondent / Appellee:
IOWA, WYOMING, JUDGES, DAS Attorneys Related Cases, Et Al. and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROB ALLEN PATTERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
