Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Miller v. City of Eugene, et al.
as 23-4160
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKIE A. MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF EUGENE, EUGENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, Det. ANNE MCINTYRE and others
Brooks v. Fowler et al
as 6:2023cv01379
Plaintiff:
Matthew D. Brooks
Defendant:
Heather Deschamps Fowler, Matthew Jason Fowler and Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Miller v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv01803
Plaintiff:
Rickie A. Miller
Defendant:
City of Eugene, Eugene Police Department, Det. Anne McIntyre and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharif v. City of Eugene et al
as 6:2021cv00310
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department, City of Eugene, Officer Ryan Trullinger and others
Plaintiff:
Muhsin Sharif
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Dylan Wayne Jones
Defendant:
Officer Jon Doe 1, Officer Jon Doe 4, Officer Jon Doe 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Eugene Police Department
as 6:2020cv01299
Plaintiff:
Rickie Miller
Defendant:
Eugene Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamid Hejazi v. USDOJ, et al
as 20-35164
Defendant / Appellee:
LANE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, OREGON STATE POLICE, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, Director of U.S. DHS and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
HAMID MICHAEL HEJAZI
Bondick v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv02011
Defendant:
Officer M. Grose, Officer K. Martes, Officer N Baillas and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bondick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Eugene Police Department et al
as 6:2019cv01867
Defendant:
Patricia Perlow, City of Eugene, Patty Perlow and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Atril Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hejazi v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2019cv01553
Defendant:
Lane County, Ellen Rosenblum, State of Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
Hamid Michael Hejazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
