Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv22327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv02508
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv02535
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11302
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ndom v. Muller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv03551
Petitioner: Mamadou Ndom
Respondent: Robert S. Muller, III, Michael A. Cannon, Jonathan Scharfen and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Type: Other Statutes None
Mamadou Ndom v. USDC-CAN
as 08-72817
: In re: MAMADOU NDOM
Petitioner: MAMADOU NDOM
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest: EVELYN UPCHURCH, Director of USCIS, Texas Service Center, ROBERT S. MULLER, III, Department of Justice, Director of FBI, JONATHAN SCHARFEN, Acting Director of USCIS, USCIS Headquarters and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01858
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10953
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv10891
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv01691
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?