Cases 1 - 10 of 295
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dodge et al v. Doe Creek Farm, Inc.
as 7:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
Earl Dodge and Lauren Sheehan
Defendant:
Doe Creek Farm, Inc. doing business as Doe Creek Farm doing business as The Bad Apple
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Burgess v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Earl Dushawn Burgess
Defendant:
Virginia Commonwealth of and Virginia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Roanoke City Jail et al
as 7:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gregory T. Nelson
Defendant:
Roanoke City Jail, Lt. Earls, Sgt. Donahue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braswell v. Ruby
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Danny Earl Braswell
Defendant:
Dr. Ruby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Mulky et al
as 7:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Davis
Defendant:
Todd Mulky, SWVRJA- Tazewell, Rick Albrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elder v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 2:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Earl Raymond Elder
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Combs v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00601
Plaintiff:
Earl Nathaniel Combs, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combs v. Unknown
as 3:2023cv00553
Petitioner:
Earl Combs, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
