Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Easley v. Northeast Texas Home Health Agency, Ltd. d/b/a At Home Healthcare
as 2:2018cv00019
Plaintiff:
Alesha Easley
Defendant:
Northeast Texas Home Health Agency, Ltd. d/b/a At Home Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Easley v. Van Zandt County
as 2:2017cv00696
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Easley
Defendant:
Van Zandt County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Randall County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00169
Plaintiff:
Randy Joel McDonald
Defendant:
Randall County Jail, Amarillo District Parole Office, Carl Pippin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Upton et al
as 4:2017cv00597
Petitioner:
Tina Easley
Respondent:
Jody Upton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McDonald v. Randall County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00126
Plaintiff:
Randy Joel McDonald
Defendant:
Randall County Jail, Amarillo City Jail, Amarillo Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00614
Petitioner:
Stacey Donnell Easley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ellis v. Gordon et al
as 6:2017cv00130
Defendant:
FNU Easley, Wendy Gordon, Parnell McNamara and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch et al v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services et al
as 4:2017cv01091
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family & Protective Services , Henry Hank Whitman , Deiandra Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Z.W. Welch , Michael Welch and K.W. Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Mott et al
as 4:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
Daryl Easley
Defendant:
K. Mott , Dr. Julye and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easley v. Upton et al
as 4:2017cv00016
Petitioner:
Tina Easley
Respondent:
Jody Upton, Department of Justice and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
