Cases 41 - 50 of 107
Endeavor Meshtech, Inc. v. Eaton Corporation
as 1:2014cv02422
Plaintiff:
Endeavor Meshtech, Inc.
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Pinnell v. Eaton Corporation
as 2:2014cv13999
Plaintiff:
David Pinnell
Defendant:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States of America v. Eaton Corporation et al
as 1:2013mc00111
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Eaton Corporation and Includible Subsidiaries
United States of America v. Eaton Corporation
as 1:2013mc00102
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Eaton Corporation
Filing Error
as 1:2013cv02685
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Eaton Corporation
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Florida Carpenters Regional v. Eaton Corporation, et al
as 13-4354
Movant - Appellant:
In re: KBC ASSET MANAGEMENT N.V.
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FLORIDA CARPENTERS REGIONAL COUNCIL PENSION PLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EATON CORPORATION, ALEXANDER M. CUTLER, MARK M. MCGUIRE and others
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al v. Teton Transportation, Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00646
Plaintiff:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA and Eaton Corporation
Defendant:
Teton Transportation, Inc, Celadon Group, Inc. and Saturn Freight System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6303
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Florida Carpenters Regional v. Eaton Corp., et al
as 13-4059
Movant - Appellant:
In re: KBC ASSET MANAGEMENT NV
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FLORIDA CARPENTERS REGIONAL COUNCIL PENSION PLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
EATON CORPORATION, ALEXANDER M. CUTLER, MARK M. MCGUIRE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
