Cases 11 - 20 of 841
Carlton Landis v. Ebbert, et al
as 22-1265
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLTON THEODORE LANDIS
Defendant:
DAVID J. EBBERT, IAN CONNERS, J. RAY ORMOND and others
Kareem MillhouseIn re: Kareem Millhouse
as 22-1031
Petitioner:
In re: KAREEM HASSAN MILLHOUSE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, B. MOTTERN, Senior Officer, BOUSSAUG, Senior Officer and others
Johnson v. United States et al
as 1:2021cv02109
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Johnson
Defendant:
United States, John Doe, David S. Ebbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EBBERT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62611
Plaintiff:
ERYN EBBERT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yusuf Bush v. David Ebbert
as 21-3060
Petitioner / Appellant:
Yusuf O. Bush
Respondent / Appellee:
David J. Ebbert
Gregor et al v. Rice Drilling D LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03999
Plaintiff:
Anthony J Gregor, Ashley N Gregor, BRK Energy LLC and others
Defendant:
Rice Drilling D LLC, EQT Production Company, EQT Energy LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linwood v. Bobshan Entertainment, Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00851
Counter Defendant:
Jelicia Linwood
Counter Claimant:
BOBSHAN ENTERTAINMENT, INC and Robert Ebbert
Defendant:
Bobshan Entertainment, Inc doing business as Elegance Cabaret
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Linwood v.Bobshan Entertainment, Inc et al
as 4:2021cv00789
Defendant:
BOBSHAN ENTERTAINMENT, INC, Robert Ebbert and Bobshan Entertainment, Inc doing business as Elegance Cabaret
Plaintiff:
Jelicia Linwood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
SMITH v. EBBERT et al
as 1:2021cv00915
Defendant:
David J Ebbert and Colbert
Plaintiff:
Elijah M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bralen Jordan v. David J. Ebbert, et al
as 21-1638
Defendant / Appellee:
BADRISCH, WATSON, Associate Program, T. CRAWFORD and others
Intervenor Defendant:
NURSE JEANA MITTERLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN L. JORDAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
