Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,729
Bradford et al v. Anschuetz et al
as 3:2024cv02799
Plaintiff: Galen Bradford and Gary Brown
Defendant: Nathaniel Anschuetz, Jonathan Bram, Guthrie Dundas and others
Ma v. Faricy et al
as 3:2024cv00247
Plaintiff: Jianping Ma
Defendant: Peter Faricy, Guthrie Dundas, Elizabeth Eby and others
Beall v. Faricy et al
as 3:2024cv00302
Plaintiff: Ashley Beall
Defendant: Peter Faricy, Nathaniel Anschuetz, Jonathan Bram and others
Interested Party: Jianping Ma
Jianping v. Faricy et al
as 3:2024cv00244
Plaintiff: Ma Jianping
Defendant: Peter Faricy, Guthrie Dundas, Elizabeth Eby and others
Simpson v. SunPower Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv06302
Plaintiff: Matthew Simpson
Defendant: SunPower Corporation, Peter Faricy, Guthrie Dundas and others
Armendariz v. Juul Labs, Inc., previously d/b/a as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08080
Plaintiff: Erik Armendariz
Defendant: Juul Labs, Inc.,, Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Craven v. SunPower Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv05544
Plaintiff: Jacob Warren Craven
Defendant: SunPower Corporation, Peter Faricy, Guthrie Dundas and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00069
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gilpin v. McCullough et al
as 3:2023cv01037
Plaintiff: Brandon Nicholas Gilpin
Defendant: Lt. Barb McCullough and Captain Eby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison et al v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2023cv00950
Plaintiff: Adaja Madison and Estate of Jermelle Madison
Defendant: Clackamas County, Naphcare Inc., Angela Brandenburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?