Cases 1 - 10 of 345
Griffin v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Sam Griffin
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pena v. Gonzalez
as 24-20163
Plaintiff:
Martin Pena, Jr.
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Sheriff of Harris County and Joshua Dillard, Jailer/ Public Servant
Savage v. Harris County, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
Mikayla Cheyenne Savage
Defendant:
Harris County, Texas, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Harris County Sheriff Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Giagnacovo v. Gonzalez
as 4:2024cv01162
Petitioner:
Hector Giagnacovo
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giagnacovo v. Romero et al
as 4:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
Hector Damian Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Romero, Sanchez, Ed Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giagnacovo v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
Hector Giagnacovo
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez, Unknown Detention Officers and Unknown Detention Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drakos v. Lumpkin et al
as 4:2024cv00531
Petitioner:
Ronald Thomas Drakos, II
Respondent:
Ed Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKelvin Smith v. Capital One Auto Financing et al
as 4:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Veronica McKelvin Smith
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Financing, Dereyk Fields, Kenneth Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Yates v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Banon G Yates
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez and Harris County Chaplain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Ed Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv01077
Plaintiff:
Raphael Ortega
Defendant:
Ed Gonzalez and Harris County Sherrif's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
