Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Derrick McRae v. Eddie Buffaloe
as 24-6350
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOVAN MCRAE
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Secretary, N.C. Department of Public Safety
Anthony Hoover El v. Stephen Waddel
as 24-6226
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, Warden IV, JASON ADAMS, Gatekeeper, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., Magistrate and others
Jerry Sharpe v. Eddie Buffaloe
as 24-6164
Petitioner:
JERRY L. SHARPE
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Simaron Hill v. Eddie Buffaloe
as 24-6034
Petitioner:
SIMARON D. HILL
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
DOE 1 et al v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and JOHN DOE 3
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR., WILLIAM L. LASSITER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HOOVER EL v. WADDEL et al
as 1:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STEPHEN WADDEL, JASON ADAMS, EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herman Dawson v. Eddie Buffaloe, Jr.
as 23-7286
Petitioner:
HERMAN S. DAWSON
Respondent:
EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
FLORES v. EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
as 1:2023cv01025
Petitioner:
JUAN C. FLORES
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and EDDIE M. BUFFALOE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Meyers v. Joyce McDowell
as 23-6992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JOYCE MCDOWELL, PREA Facility Compliance Manager, MS. COVINGTON, PREA Coordinator of Scotland Correctional Institute, CHIEF AND MANAGER AND SUPERVISOR OF THE PREA OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
