Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Smith v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
Nickolaus Edward Smith
Defendant:
Sergeant Eddie Smith and Sheriff Hobe Runion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Runion et al
as 2:2023cv02129
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Runion, Eddie Smith, Captain Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boydston v. Dumas et al
as 2:2023cv02102
Plaintiff:
Shane Ellie Boydston
Defendant:
Sebastian County Detention Center, Captain Dumas, Sgt Eddie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv02096
Plaintiff:
Maurice Richardson
Defendant:
Sgt Smith, Captain Dumas, Officer Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Hakim Raekwon Williams
Defendant:
Corporal Ashley Smith, Sergeant Eddie Smith, Corporal Medlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv02028
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Stevens
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Ashley Smith, Eddie Smith, Corporal Toon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piel v. Runion et al
as 2:2021cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jonathan I. Piel
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Captain Dumas, Eddie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Runion et al
as 2:2021cv02193
Plaintiff:
Mark Trenton Williams
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Manager Eddie Smith, Captain Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Howell v. Runion et al
as 2:2021cv02188
Plaintiff:
David Howell
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Captain Dumas, Eddie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cabrera v. Dumas et al
as 2:2021cv02018
Defendant:
Sheriff Hobe Runion, Jail Administrator Eddie Smith and Captain William Dumas
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cabrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
