Cases 1 - 10 of 63
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BROOKS v. ETS, INC. et al
as 3:2025cv19014
Plaintiff:
CEKERIA BROOKS
Defendant:
ADECCO USA, INC. and EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE doing business as ETS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HEFELE v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2025cv13184
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER J HEFELE
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE
Cross-Complainant:
EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE
Cross-Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv09132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MARIN v. THE EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE (ETS)
as 3:2024cv08514
Plaintiff:
MEL MARIN
Defendant:
THE EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE (ETS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marin v. Educational Testing Service
as 24-817
Plaintiff:
MEL M. MARIN
Defendant:
EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
