Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Balapuwaduge Mendis, et al v. Schneider National Carriers
as 17-80025
Respondent:
BALAPUWADUGE MENDIS, On his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MICHAEL FEOLA, on their own behalf and on the behalf of all others similarly situated, ANDREA ARBAUGH, on her own behalf and on the behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., a Nevada Corporation
Balapuwaduge Mendis, et al v. Schneider National Carrier
as 17-80025
Plaintiff - Respondent:
BALAPUWADUGE MENDIS, On his own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MICHAEL FEOLA, on their own behalf and on the behalf of all others similarly situated, ANDREA ARBAUGH, on her own behalf and on the behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
SCHNEIDER NATIONAL CARRIERS, INC., a Nevada Corporation
Mendis v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00144
Defendant:
Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Schneider National Carriers Inc
Plaintiff:
Mendis, Balapuwaduge Mendis, Michael Feola and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Washington State Department of Labor & Industries and Washington State Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ash, et al v. Laskey, et al
as 11-1199
Plaintiff - Appellee:
EDWARD ASH and CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CLAYTON LASKEY and THOMAS LASKEY
Ash et al v. Laskey et al
as 1:2011cv01119
Plaintiff:
Edward Ash and City and County of Denver
Defendant:
John Clayton Laskey and Thomas Laskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ash et al v. Laskey et al
as 1:2011cv00949
Plaintiff:
Edward Ash and City and County of Denver
Defendant:
John Clayton Laskey and Thomas Laskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schuett v. City and County of Denver, Colorado, The et al
as 1:2009cv00837
Plaintiff:
Scott Schuett and Scott Schuett
Defendant:
City and County of Denver, Colorado, The, Denver Police Department, Denver Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Albert Augustine Romero, The v. Ash et al
as 1:2008cv01510
Plaintiff:
Estate of Albert Augustine Romero, The and Estate of Albert Augustine Romero, The
Defendant:
Edward (I) Ash, Edward Ash, Adam (I) Giggey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
