Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Davis, Jr. v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2021pq01516
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Edward Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hullinger v. Forgey MD et al
as 2:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Edward Davies, Unknown Employees of Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., J Cockrell and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hullinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Edward Davis v. City of Rockford, Illinois
as 20-3152
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD DAVIS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv50076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Wilson v. Lake County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Wilson
Defendant:
Dr. William Forgey, Edward Davies, John Buncich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez, Jr. v. Forgey et al
as 2:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, M.D., Unknown Employees of Lake County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carmen v. Buncich et al
as 2:2018cv00227
Plaintiff:
Irvin Carmen
Defendant:
John Buncich, Edward Davies, William Forgey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
as 1:2017mc00040
Respondent:
MANISH SHAILESHKUMAR ANTANI, JONATHAN REECE ARMSTRONG, ROBERT LEE ARTHUR and others
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA ANN DEAK
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS, NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES, AND/OR FAILURE TO SUBMIT IOLTA CERTIFICATION
Defendant:
CASEY COLE KANNENBERG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
