Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Esposito Brothers Inc. v. Fruit Importers Americas, Inc.
as 1:2016cv04000
Plaintiff:
Esposito Brothers Inc.
Defendant:
Fruit Importers Americas, Inc., Edward Hickey, Alvaro Fernando Noboa Ponton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
NYKCool A.B. v. Pacific International Service
as 14-2597
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NYKCool A.B.
Defendant:
Pacific International Services, Inc., Pan American Trading Company, Inc., Fruit Importers Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Truisfruit S.A.
NYKCool A.B. v. Pacific International Services
as 14-1260
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NYKCool A.B.
Defendant:
Pacific International Services, Inc., Pan American Trading Company, Inc., Fruit Importers Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Truisfruit S.A.
Bankert v. North Attleborough Conservation Commission et al
as 1:2013cv11859
Defendant:
North Attleborough Conservation Commission , Clifford Bassett , Shannon Doyle and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Bankert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
NYKCool A.B. v. Pacific International Service
as 13-2730
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NYKCool A.B.
Defendant:
Pacific International Services, Inc., Pan American Trading Company, Inc., Fruit Importers Americas, Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Ecuadorian Line, Inc.
NYKCool A.B. v. Pacific International Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05754
Plaintiff:
NYKCool A.B.
Defendant:
Pacific International Services, Inc., Pan American Trading Company, Inc., Fruit Importers Americas, Inc. and others
Garnishee:
Redi Fresh Produce, Inc.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Maria C Aguirre
Interested Party:
Pacific Fruit Inc. and Kelso Enterprises Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 ad Admiralty
Halali v. City University of New York et al
as 1:2009cv03964
Plaintiff:
Tzion Halali
Defendant:
City University of New York, Jason Norr, Edward Hickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
