Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Mahoney v. MCFP Springfield, Warden
as 1:2023cv00412
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
MCFP Springfield, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mahoney v. Saris et al
as 1:2023cv10290
Plaintiff:
Edward Mahoney and Brian Mahoney
Defendant:
Judge Patti B. Saris, Clerk Matthew Paine, Claride Geraldino-Karasek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv10806
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mahoney v. USA
as 1:2021fp00364
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Martin
as 1:2020cv00349
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Grondolsky
as 1:2017cv11142
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
Jeffrey Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mahoney v. Colvin et al
as 1:2015cv13023
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Mahoney v. FMC Devens, Warden et al
as 1:2015fp00213
Respondent:
FMC Devens, Warden and US Attorney General
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mahoney v. State of New Hampshire, et al
as 1:2014fp00431
Defendant:
Carol Ann Conboy, Linda Stewart Dalianis, James E. Duggan and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Notice Only:
NH Attorney General - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only) and NH Department of Corrections - Notice Only - Civil (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahoney v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2014cv13821
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Defendant:
Jeff Grondolsky, S. Brown, K. Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
