Cases 21 - 30 of 40
ORT v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv06041
Plaintiff:
JAMES ORT
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL and CATHERINE C. MC VEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
POLITE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2008cv06046
Plaintiff:
WILLIE POLITE, GREGORY STOVER, JOHN MOORE and others
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES (PHS) and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NESMITH v. LENAHAM et al
as 2:2008cv05631
Plaintiff:
ANDREW NESMITH
Defendant:
JOHN T. LENAHAM, EMILY HEWITT, DALE CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FIELDS v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv05373
Petitioner:
VERRON D. FIELDS
Respondent:
EDWARD RENDELL, TOM CORBETT and DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Benanti v. Tennis et al
as 3:2008cv02031
Petitioner:
Michael Benanti
Respondent:
Tennis, Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Rendell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KNIGHT v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv05248
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE H. KNIGHT, II
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL, JEFFREY BEARD and D.O.C.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DARRAS v. RENDELL et al
as 2:2008cv04362
Plaintiff:
JAMES SPERO DARRAS
Defendant:
EDWARD RENDELL and JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hollis et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania et al
as 3:2008cv01452
Plaintiff:
Douglas Hollis, James Taylor, Simon Evans and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Edward Rendell, Pennsylvania Board of Pardons and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
FERTILE v. TRELLER et al
as 2:2008cv03226
Plaintiff:
S. C. FERTILE
Defendant:
ROBERT H. TRELLER, J. JOHNSTON, BILL CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Armstead v. Rendell
as 1:2008cv01212
Plaintiff:
Brenda C. Armstead
Defendant:
Edward Rendell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
