Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Ray v. California Supreme Court
as 5:2021cv06097
Plaintiff:
Edward V. Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
California Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Sullivan
as 3:2020cv03418
Respondent:
William Joe Sullivan
Petitioner:
Edward V. Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ray v. Metcalf et al
as 5:2019cv01247
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Metcalf, S. Dunaven and Botello
Plaintiff:
Edward V. Ray, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Bradford, et al
as 15-6040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD V. RAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. BRADFORD, MS. HAGERMAN, R. FERGUSON and others
Edward Ray, III v. Matthew Cate
as 14-16901
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD V. RAY, III
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Corrections Corp. of America, et al
as 14-60609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD V. RAY, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION CORPORATION OF AMERICA, MIRANDA RANKIN, Principal, SHIRLEY SPEIGHT, Library Aide and others
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 5:2013cv00697
Plaintiff:
Edward V Ray, III
Defendant:
S Bradford, R Ferguson, Moates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Ray, III v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-71724
:
In re: EDWARD V. RAY, III
Petitioner:
EDWARD V. RAY, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Ray v. Bradford et al
as 5:2013cv00092
Plaintiff:
Edward V Ray, Jr
Defendant:
Mrs Bradford, Ms Hagerman, R Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Ray, III v. USDC-CAOAK
as 13-70083
:
In re: EDWARD V. RAY, III
Petitioner:
EDWARD V. RAY, III
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Real Party In Interest:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
