Cases 1 - 10 of 10
New Yorkers For Religious Liberty, Inc. v. The City of New York
as 22-1801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
New Yorkers For Religious Liberty, Inc., Gennaro Agovino, Curtis Cutler and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Eric Adams, Dave Chokshi, in his official capacity as Health Commissioner of the City of New York and others
Defendant:
Roberta Reardon
Appellant:
Matthew Keil, John De Luca, Dennis Strk and others
Doe v. Soldier Hollow Charter School et al
as 2:2019cv00454
Plaintiff:
Mother Doe
Defendant:
Soldier Hollow Charter School and Charles Edward Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WEBER v. ERIE COUNTY et al
as 1:2019cv00124
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EDWARD WEBER
Defendant:
JEREMY LIGHTNER, JACK DENARI, KATHY DAHLKEMPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Young v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2017cv02789
Defendant:
Stephen Bellone, County of Suffolk, Nicholas Lorusso and others
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cortes v. Suffolk County et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Plaintiff:
David Cortes
Defendant:
Sergeant John Diffley, John Doe, Tom Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-4104
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv05083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Weber v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv02018
Plaintiff:
Edward Weber
Defendant:
The City of New York and Marlene Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
